chore: update vscode engine version by ymc9 · Pull Request #225 · zenstackhq/zenstack-v3

ymc9 · 2025-09-01T10:53:48Z

Summary by CodeRabbit

Chores
- Updated VS Code compatibility requirement to v1.90.0 (supports >=1.90.0 <2.0.0). Users on older VS Code must upgrade; installs/updates will be blocked on earlier versions.
Documentation
- Fixed broken database migration link in the README so migration docs now point to the correct URL.

coderabbitai · 2025-09-01T10:53:54Z

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ymc9 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 29 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa8679b and 8a83892.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

packages/cli/src/index.ts (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Bumped VS Code extension compatibility and a devDependency in packages/ide/vscode/package.json to ^1.90.0, and fixed two README links to point to the external migration URL https://zenstack.dev/docs/3.x/orm/migration. No functional code or public API changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of changes
VS Code manifest `packages/ide/vscode/package.json`	Updated `engines.vscode` from `^1.63.0` to `^1.90.0` and bumped `devDependencies["@types/vscode"]` from `^1.63.0` to `^1.90.0`.
Documentation links `README.md`	Replaced malformed migration anchor with direct URL `https://zenstack.dev/docs/3.x/orm/migration` in two locations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

feat: vscode extension #23 — Updates the same VS Code extension manifest; directly related to packages/ide/vscode/package.json changes.
merge dev to main (3.0.0-alpha.4) #31 — Also modifies packages/ide/vscode/package.json (version/repo fields); likely overlapping edits.
chore: update readme #216 — Adjusts README migration link to the external URL; directly related to the README edits.

Poem

I nibble bytes and hop on keys,
Bumped engines up with nimble ease.
Two links fixed, the path is clear,
Carrots bloom for devs this year.
— a rabbit, joyful, code and cheer 🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch chore/vscode-engine-version

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the minimum required VS Code engine version from 1.63.0 to 1.90.0 for the VS Code extension package.

Updates VS Code engine requirement to leverage newer API features and capabilities

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

claude · 2025-09-01T10:54:00Z

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job

PR Review Complete

I've thoroughly reviewed this PR that updates the VS Code engine version requirement. Here's my comprehensive analysis:

Summary

The PR updates the minimum VS Code engine version from ^1.63.0 to ^1.90.0 in packages/ide/vscode/package.json:51.

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

The change is clean and straightforward
Follows semantic versioning convention correctly
No code style issues identified

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

1. Inconsistent Type Definitions

Issue: @types/vscode is still pinned to ^1.63.0 (line 39) while the engine requirement was bumped to ^1.90.0 (line 51)
Impact: This creates a mismatch between the declared minimum VS Code version and the TypeScript definitions being used
Recommendation: Update @types/vscode to ^1.90.0 to match the engine requirement

2. Breaking Change for Users

Issue: This is a significant version jump (~27 months of VS Code releases)
Impact: Users on older VS Code versions (1.63.0 to 1.89.x) will no longer be able to use the extension
Recommendation: Document this breaking change and consider if such a large jump is necessary

✅ Security & Performance

No security concerns identified
No performance implications from this change
Extension uses stable Language Server Protocol APIs

✅ Extension Code Analysis

The extension code (src/extension/main.ts) uses basic VS Code APIs that are compatible across the version range:

Standard Language Client/Server Protocol implementation
Basic extension lifecycle methods (activate, deactivate)
No advanced VS Code APIs that would require newer versions

❓ Test Coverage

No tests appear to exist for the VS Code extension package
Consider adding basic extension activation tests

📋 Missing Documentation

No mention of VS Code version requirements in README.md
Consider documenting minimum version requirements for users

Recommendations

Critical: Update @types/vscode dependency to match the engine version:
```
"@types/vscode": "^1.90.0"
```
Consider: Add a changelog entry or release note about the breaking change in minimum VS Code version
Optional: Add VS Code version requirements to the README.md for user visibility

Approval Status

Conditional approval - should fix the @types/vscode version mismatch before merging.

claude · 2025-09-01T10:57:12Z

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job

PR Review Complete

I've thoroughly reviewed this PR that updates the VS Code engine version requirement. Here's my comprehensive analysis:

Summary

The PR updates the minimum VS Code engine version from ^1.63.0 to ^1.90.0 in packages/ide/vscode/package.json:51.

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

The change is clean and straightforward
Follows semantic versioning convention correctly
No code style issues identified

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

1. Inconsistent Type Definitions

Issue: @types/vscode is still pinned to ^1.63.0 (line 39) while the engine requirement was bumped to ^1.90.0 (line 51)
Impact: This creates a mismatch between the declared minimum VS Code version and the TypeScript definitions being used
Recommendation: Update @types/vscode to ^1.90.0 to match the engine requirement

2. Breaking Change for Users

Issue: This is a significant version jump (~27 months of VS Code releases)
Impact: Users on older VS Code versions (1.63.0 to 1.89.x) will no longer be able to use the extension
Recommendation: Document this breaking change and consider if such a large jump is necessary

✅ Security & Performance

No security concerns identified
No performance implications from this change
Extension uses stable Language Server Protocol APIs

✅ Extension Code Analysis

The extension code (src/extension/main.ts) uses basic VS Code APIs that are compatible across the version range:

Standard Language Client/Server Protocol implementation
Basic extension lifecycle methods (activate, deactivate)
No advanced VS Code APIs that would require newer versions

❓ Test Coverage

No tests appear to exist for the VS Code extension package
Consider adding basic extension activation tests

📋 Missing Documentation

No mention of VS Code version requirements in README.md
Consider documenting minimum version requirements for users

Recommendations

Critical: Update @types/vscode dependency to match the engine version:
```
"@types/vscode": "^1.90.0"
```
Consider: Add a changelog entry or release note about the breaking change in minimum VS Code version
Optional: Add VS Code version requirements to the README.md for user visibility

Approval Status

Conditional approval - should fix the @types/vscode version mismatch before merging.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20afec5 and c44e0c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

packages/ide/vscode/package.json (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

{packages,samples,tests}/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)

Packages are located in packages/, samples/, and tests/

Files:

packages/ide/vscode/package.json

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)
GitHub Check: claude-review

🔇 Additional comments (1)

packages/ide/vscode/package.json (1)

51-53: engines.node>=20.0.0 is safe—VS Code 1.90.0 uses Node.js 20.9.0: the extension host meets this requirement at runtime (reddit.com). Keep the constraint only if you depend on Node 20-specific APIs; otherwise drop it to avoid confusion.

packages/ide/vscode/package.json

claude · 2025-09-01T10:59:10Z

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job

PR Review Complete

I've thoroughly reviewed this PR that updates the VS Code engine version requirement. Here's my comprehensive analysis:

Summary

The PR updates the minimum VS Code engine version from ^1.63.0 to ^1.90.0 in packages/ide/vscode/package.json:51.

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

The change is clean and straightforward
Follows semantic versioning convention correctly
No code style issues identified

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

1. Inconsistent Type Definitions

Issue: @types/vscode is still pinned to ^1.63.0 (line 39) while the engine requirement was bumped to ^1.90.0 (line 51)
Impact: This creates a mismatch between the declared minimum VS Code version and the TypeScript definitions being used
Recommendation: Update @types/vscode to ^1.90.0 to match the engine requirement

2. Breaking Change for Users

Issue: This is a significant version jump (~27 months of VS Code releases)
Impact: Users on older VS Code versions (1.63.0 to 1.89.x) will no longer be able to use the extension
Recommendation: Document this breaking change and consider if such a large jump is necessary

✅ Security & Performance

No security concerns identified
No performance implications from this change
Extension uses stable Language Server Protocol APIs

✅ Extension Code Analysis

The extension code (src/extension/main.ts) uses basic VS Code APIs that are compatible across the version range:

Standard Language Client/Server Protocol implementation
Basic extension lifecycle methods (activate, deactivate)
No advanced VS Code APIs that would require newer versions

❓ Test Coverage

No tests appear to exist for the VS Code extension package
Consider adding basic extension activation tests

📋 Missing Documentation

No mention of VS Code version requirements in README.md
Consider documenting minimum version requirements for users

Recommendations

Critical: Update @types/vscode dependency to match the engine version:
```
"@types/vscode": "^1.90.0"
```
Consider: Add a changelog entry or release note about the breaking change in minimum VS Code version
Optional: Add VS Code version requirements to the README.md for user visibility

Approval Status

Conditional approval - should fix the @types/vscode version mismatch before merging.

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c44e0c7 and aa8679b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

README.md (1 hunks)
packages/ide/vscode/package.json (2 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

packages/ide/vscode/package.json

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (4)

📚 Learning: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: zenstackhq/zenstack-v3#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z
Learning: Kysely-Based ORM: V3 uses Kysely as query builder instead of Prisma runtime dependency

Applied to files:

README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: zenstackhq/zenstack-v3#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z
Learning: `zenstack generate` compiles ZModel to TypeScript schema (`schema.ts`)

Applied to files:

README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: zenstackhq/zenstack-v3#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z
Learning: No runtime dependency on prisma/client

Applied to files:

README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z

Learnt from: CR
PR: zenstackhq/zenstack-v3#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-04T08:43:33.161Z
Learning: Schema-first approach with ZModel DSL extension of Prisma schema language

Applied to files:

README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

GitHub Check: claude-review
GitHub Check: build-test (20.x)

README.md

claude · 2025-09-01T11:04:30Z

Claude finished @ymc9's task —— View job

PR Review Complete

I've thoroughly reviewed this PR that updates the VS Code engine version and fixes documentation links. Here's my comprehensive analysis:

Todo List:

Read and analyze changed files
Review VS Code extension package.json changes
Review README.md link fixes
Check for code quality issues
Assess potential bugs and security concerns
Evaluate performance impact
Review test coverage
Provide comprehensive feedback

Summary

This PR makes two main changes:

VS Code Engine Update: Updates the minimum VS Code version requirement from ^1.63.0 to ^1.90.0 in packages/ide/vscode/package.json:51
Documentation Fix: Updates migration documentation links in README.md to point to the correct external URL

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

The VS Code engine version update follows semantic versioning correctly
Changes are minimal and focused
No code style issues identified
Documentation links are properly formatted

⚠️ Critical Issue Found

Type Definition Mismatch

File: packages/ide/vscode/package.json:39
Issue: @types/vscode is still set to ^1.63.0 while the engine requirement was bumped to ^1.90.0 (line 51)
Impact: This creates a significant mismatch between the declared minimum VS Code version and the TypeScript definitions being used during development
Risk: Could lead to:
- Runtime errors when using APIs available in VS Code 1.90.0+ but not typed in 1.63.0 definitions
- Missing compile-time type checking for newer VS Code APIs
- Development experience inconsistencies

Recommendation: Update @types/vscode to ^1.90.0 to match the engine requirement

📋 Breaking Change Analysis

Impact: This is a significant version jump (VS Code 1.63.0 was released in November 2021, 1.90.0 in May 2024)
User Impact: Users on VS Code versions 1.63.0 to 1.89.x will no longer be able to install or update the extension
Consideration: The jump spans ~2.5 years of VS Code releases

✅ Extension Code Analysis

I reviewed the extension's main code and found it uses basic VS Code APIs:

Standard Language Server Protocol implementation
Basic extension lifecycle methods (activate, deactivate)
No advanced VS Code APIs that would require newer versions

Question: Given the extension uses basic APIs, is the jump to 1.90.0 necessary, or could a more conservative update be sufficient?

✅ Security & Performance

No security concerns identified
No performance implications from version requirement changes
Extension follows standard LSP patterns

❓ Test Coverage

No tests appear to exist for the VS Code extension package
Recommendation: Consider adding basic extension activation and LSP connection tests

✅ Documentation Links

README.md migration links properly updated to point to external documentation
Links use correct anchor format and point to the expected migration documentation section

Minor Issues

Node.js Engine Constraint (packages/ide/vscode/package.json:52)
- Current: "node": ">=18.0.0"
- VS Code 1.90.0 uses Node.js 20.9.0 internally
- Consider if the constraint should be updated to >=20.0.0 if using Node 20+ specific APIs
Missing Documentation
- No mention of VS Code version requirements in user-facing documentation
- Consider documenting minimum version requirements for users

Recommendations

Critical (Must Fix)

Update @types/vscode to match engine version:
```
"@types/vscode": "^1.90.0"
```

Should Consider

Document Breaking Change: Add changelog entry or release note about the minimum VS Code version increase
Add VS Code Requirements: Document version requirements in README for user visibility

Optional

Add Tests: Consider basic extension activation tests
Review Node Constraint: Evaluate if Node.js version should be updated to match VS Code's runtime

Final Assessment

Conditional Approval - The core changes are sound, but the @types/vscode version mismatch should be resolved before merging to ensure development and runtime consistency.

chore: update vscode engine version

c44e0c7

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 1, 2025 10:53

Copilot AI reviewed Sep 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

update

1623021

coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

packages/ide/vscode/package.json Show resolved Hide resolved

update

aa8679b

coderabbitai bot reviewed Sep 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved

update

8a83892

ymc9 merged commit 116ddcc into dev Sep 1, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed

Uh oh!

Conversation

ymc9 commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Rate limit exceeded

Walkthrough

Changes

Estimated code review effort

Possibly related PRs

Poem

Chat

Support

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Status, Documentation and Community

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Complete

Summary

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

✅ Security & Performance

✅ Extension Code Analysis

❓ Test Coverage

📋 Missing Documentation

Recommendations

Approval Status

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Complete

Summary

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

✅ Security & Performance

✅ Extension Code Analysis

❓ Test Coverage

📋 Missing Documentation

Recommendations

Approval Status

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Complete

Summary

Review Findings

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

⚠️ Potential Issues Found

✅ Security & Performance

✅ Extension Code Analysis

❓ Test Coverage

📋 Missing Documentation

Recommendations

Approval Status

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Review Complete

Summary

Review Findings

ymc9 commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

claude bot commented Sep 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading